Eureka! Eureka!  

Monday, August 08, 2005

At last, I've found out the place from where the passages for Reading comprehension are taken for GRE. The following is an essay from the source. If you understand it, you are a genius. And if you don't, scroll down after the essay to find my explanations.

The Reality of the fatal flaw in the Neosemanticist theory

If one examines postdialectic discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject Lyotardist narrative or conclude that reality is capable of truth. Bataille uses the term 'constructive neosemanticist theory' to denote the role of the writer as reader.

"Class is elitist," says Marx. However, the failure of Lyotardist narrative which is a central theme of Rushdie's The Ground Beneath Her Feet is also evident in Midnight's Children, although in a more self-sufficient sense. Baudrillard's essay on postdialectic discourse states that sexual identity, ironically, has objective value, given that dialectic materialism is valid.

It could be said that an abundance of deconceptualisms concerning Lyotardist narrative exist. Sartre's analysis of postcapitalist dialectic theory suggests that the collective is capable of significance.

But many constructions concerning the bridge between class and society may be discovered. Derrida uses the term 'constructive neosemanticist theory' to denote not narrative, but neonarrative.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a postdialectic discourse that includes language as a paradox. Scuglia implies that we have to choose between textual nihilism and Marxist capitalism.

Therefore, von Junz implies that we have to choose between postdialectic discourse and pretextual cultural theory. The main theme of d'Erlette's model of constructive neosemanticist theory is not theory, as Marx would have it, but subtheory.

Ha ha ha!!! You didn't understand that. Did you? The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by a software called 'The Postmodernism Generator'.
It places random words from various articles and presents you with an 'almost believable' essay. Now, do you agree with my statement about the GRE reading comprehension?

For more information about the Postmodernism generator, click here:

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Email this post

3 comments: to “ Eureka! Eureka!

  • Old Comedywriter
    Thursday, September 01, 2005 11:52:00 AM  

    I never got the "post-modern" thing. Does that make us "pre-future" ? And when did things stop being modern?
    Somebody, please, let me know when the future becomes obsolete.
    Pseudo-faux para-noir - that's a good one. It would let us refer to flashbacks as "para-noir experiences."
    Throw in enough foreign-sounding words, and you can make "old movies" sound really cool.

  • Abinand
    Thursday, September 01, 2005 9:49:00 PM  

    Hey! that essay was meaningless. Did you read it fully? It is generated by a software called 'POST MODERN GENERATOR' which employs an engine named' DADA ENGINE' to randomly place words to form seemingly meaningful sentences.

  • Kirthi
    Sunday, September 04, 2005 6:18:00 AM  

    Preposterous! Some guileless GRE student perusing this would have had a brain haemorrhage.


Design by Amanda @ Blogger Buster